Throughout the school building, Wikis can be used most
effectively in several ways. One of the opportunities that presents itself is
with a short research project where students display their work. Also, another
example of a Wiki would be a compilation of vocabulary words mutually exclusive
to the classroom subject area. More times than not, one of the greatest
purposes of a Wiki is to be a webpage which collects links posted by both
teacher and students pertaining to the course. Moreover, this aspect could also
involve documents or files which coincided with the classroom course of study.
A trend, however, is designing a Wiki to serve as an e-portfolio for students
where they can upload their work throughout the class and receive feedback.
Despite all of its beneficial functions, a
Wiki does have a few drawbacks, too. For starters, much like Wikipedia anyone
can edit the content by taking away or adding to what is already there. The
integrity of the information provided is compromised when this is allowed to
occur. This can put a strain on the teacher to verify that the correct
information is displayed on the classroom Wiki. Along with that, the learners
themselves can create a collaborative bias in that only their points of view
are unfurled on the Wiki. This can create a major rift between factual
information and tainted misinformation created by the students as they post
ideas and topics which are contrary to the primary sources of information
thereof. This, too, can cause problems for the teacher to dispel biased details
which have no truthful backing.
One of the uses for a Wiki that I found particularly
strong was one concerning the research of Dr. Rossi of the University of
Delaware. Instructing both a Calculus and Applied Mathematics courses, he
created noticed that having students use Wikis throughout his courses allowed
the learners to spend more time outside the classroom concerning solving
mathematical problems mainly due to the fact that there is a collaborative
atmosphere of feedback between students on this format. I found this to be a
strong point because as a current teacher I think about all of the times that I
wished that my students were involved in my subject’s curriculum outside of
class. This is yet another way to accomplish this goal, and it was all because
of a Wiki.
In contrast, the only piece of information that I found
weak was just using a Wiki as a mere “storage cabinet” when in fact, its
purpose should be a student-friendly collaborative tool. One of the ways to
move Wikis toward being active spaces for collaboration is to allow student
interaction with the topics at hand instead of just having the space to serve
as a destination for documents and files. This can be done by giving students
passwords and consequently access to editing privileges so that they can both
manipulate what is stored and what is discussed on the Wikis themselves. This
allows collaborative feedback among learners so that they can learn from each
other. However, some intervening needs to be made for the instructor so that
the correct and appropriate kind of collaboration occurs for the means of educating
the class on how to best conduct their group projects.
Every student and teacher’s nightmare – they work diligently on a school/classroom project only to log in the next day and find that small but noticeable changes have occurred. With collaboration you have coercion. Sounds like a banner of a revolution – doesn’t it. How can one keep the information safe? How can one keep student and teacher biases out of the mix? As hard as we fight to keep information free, clear, and bias free, the more bias and misinformation seems to get through. At the school I work at Wikipedia is blocked by the school filtering software. I don’t know how many times a student turns to a Wiki only to focus the project on faulty information. Even the creator of Wikipedia explained that Wikipedia should be used as a starting point, not a definitive answer. So, as educators we must teach the future students that Wikis are a great collaborative Web 2.0 tool but are not the end all and be all of information. Teach them the power as well as the faults of the Wiki. As a teacher proof everything bit of student work before publishing. Yep – that’s all I got.
ReplyDeleteRoger, your example of Dr. Rossi’s research had me thinking about the current Edmodo trend. This “new” technology isn’t really new. Having students use a wiki space as a collaborative place for discussing ideas—or how to solve a problem—is a great idea that doesn’t necessitate a complicated (or expensive) platform. Sharing ideas seems to me a better plan than having kids use a wiki to publish factual or researched information. As you mentioned, kids aren’t always great at fact-checking or at selecting reliable sources.
ReplyDeleteOne way I might use a wiki space is to have students share creative assignments there. For instance, my class is about to complete a body biography project for The Joy Luck Club, and although I would love to display these life-sized projects in my classroom, there simply isn’t enough space. Your post gave me a great idea. I will photograph my students’ projects as they present them next week, and then I’ll post them on a wiki space. To engage the kids, I’m going to have them view projects from other classes and respond to them in some way (still coming up with a plan for that).
Thanks for your great post!